You have put real work into making something good. Getting it in front of enough of the right people, and doing it quickly, is a separate job: video, search, LinkedIn, and the rest. No single thing does it. A few different approaches work, if you keep at them. This pack goes through those, with the tools worth a look and a few things worth reading.
You are already making good work. The next job is a different one: getting it in front of enough of the right people, and doing it quickly, across the channels that matter to you. Video, LinkedIn, Instagram, search. Each one works differently.
There is no silver bullet here, and anyone who tells you there is one is selling something. What works is a handful of approaches, run by someone who keeps trying things, sees which ones work and why, then does more of those. A lot of it is not hard. It is knowledgeable, patient work. Give a sharp person on your team the time and the tools, and a lot of this becomes their job.
Video is where a lot of people spend their time now. It is the biggest streaming platform in the world, the most-watched home for podcasts, and the second largest search engine after Google. It does the job television, radio and film used to do, in one place.
One thing shapes how you work on it. Your video is not pushed into a feed. A person looks at your title and picture and decides whether to give you their time. If they don't, the rest of the video never gets seen. Everything below is about earning that decision.
The title and thumbnail together are the biggest factor in whether a video works. Videos fall down here more than anywhere, before anyone gets to the production. A small change to the packaging has produced up to 40 times the views on the same video.
The moment someone clicks, deliver on the promise. Put the value up front in the first 30 seconds, then keep giving them a reason to stay. You have to keep earning their attention.
Build formats you can repeat, not one-off videos. A show people can binge sets up an expectation they come back for. Think of it as a channel with a show, not a folder you put videos in.
If one thing deserves more of your effort than the rest, it is the title and thumbnail. Improving the picture by 30 to 40 percent has produced up to 40 times the views on the same footage. Write 30 or more titles for every video. That sounds like a lot until you see that most are small variations, and writing them is how you land on the one that works.
World's fastest, biggest, smallest, best. Simple, visual words people take in at a glance.
World's fastest camera drone vs an F1 car
A straight comparison creates a bit of tension, and it works in any subject.
$1 vs $10 vs $100 golf club
Shows the progression and the effort behind it. People click it.
10 minutes vs 1 hour vs 24 hours
Private tour of, getting access to, behind the scenes at. It runs on the fear of missing out.
Private tour of a place people can't get into
Being specific makes it feel made for the person reading it.
Five money habits the top 1 percent use
Eighty percent of what you make should interest eighty percent of your audience. Keep twenty percent for the experiments that push you forward.
In a ten minute video, a fifth to a third of your effort should go into the first minute. If the opening is wrong, people decide early that the video is underwhelming and give you less room for the rest. That is the MrBeast principle, and it holds whether you have two subscribers or two million.
A good intro does four things in order. It delivers on the promise the title made, straight away. It gives just enough context, not a lecture. It teases something worth staying for. Then it moves into the main content without a jarring cut. Ninety-five percent of people watch with the sound on, so the audio has to carry as much as the picture.
Brand channels too often treat video like a storage locker. Product launches, the founder's letter, training material. You end up with a title like "Retail Fundamentals: Introduction to Mass Retail" getting 634 views in nine days. That was never going to find an audience.
The fix is to think like a TV show. Before anything gets made, three questions have to have real answers.
Name the person who would choose to watch this on a Friday night. If you can't, the video has no audience.
What do they get out of it. Entertainment, a real answer, a look at something they can't otherwise see. Give them a reason to watch, don't just broadcast at them.
What can you make that others can't, because of the access, resources or authority you have.
That last question is the important one. You have some mix of three things to trade on. Access: early product, exclusive places, the people others can't reach. Resources: production, reach, technical depth, budget. Authority: genuine expertise, data, history, a credible voice. If you have spent years earning real authority in a field, that is the rarest of the three, and the one people rarely use.
Long-form and short-form do different jobs. The deeper relationship, and the better money, come from long videos watched like television. Shorts reach new people and let you test an idea cheaply before you commit. Roughly 70 percent long-form for depth, 30 percent short-form for discovery. Watch out for shorts inflation, where the view count climbs but nothing else does.
Ads built this way carry roughly a 30 percent short-term sales lift. The letters are Attract, Brand, Connect, Direct.
| Video benchmark | Average | Range across industries |
|---|---|---|
| View rate | 31.9% | 15.7% to 51.4% |
| Click-through rate | 0.65% | 0.09% to 1.64% |
| Cost per view | $0.026 | $0.01 to $0.19 |
| Cost per thousand | $9 | $1 to $23 |
For a trust business, the finance pattern is the relevant one: cost per view runs higher, roughly $0.40 to $0.60, but the content is educational and it converts at real value. It is credibility earned over time on camera.
For twenty years search barely changed. You put keywords into your pages, earned links from other sites, wrote blog posts, and that was how people found you. About a year ago that started to change fast. More and more people open ChatGPT, or Google's AI mode, and get the answer without clicking a link at all.
Turning up in that world takes different work. It is less about the words on your own website and more about whether other people mention you. When your subject gets discussed in articles, on podcasts, in other people's videos, that is what the models read and repeat. A podcast helps here: every episode is something that can be quoted, and every guest is another audience that hears your name.
Be named where your subject is talked about. Guest spots, quotes, mentions in other people's work do more now than another page on your own site.
Publish clear, specific answers to the questions people ask. Structured, quotable, easy for a model to pick up and attribute.
Ask ChatGPT and Google's AI mode what they say about your subject and your name. That answer is what people see now, so it is worth working on.
There is a useful advantage here. If Google can answer a question on its own results page, it keeps the visit. If it can't, it sends the person to whoever can. A tool, a simulator, a calculator, something people use, is the kind of thing it can't answer itself. Build that and people come to you for it.
Until recently you needed engineers for this. Now, with something like Claude Code acting as a technical colleague, deep knowledge and a bit of direction are enough to build small tools that do a real job. The rare combination is this: real expertise in your field, and the willingness to put it into something people can use.
Here are a few built this way, to show what small, useful tools can look like:
Drop in your marketing numbers and it sorts activity from outcomes, inputs from effects. A question answered interactively, not in a blog post.
See the coach →Paste a brief and get a diagnosis in seconds. Weak work often starts with a brief that doesn't know how it wants to work.
See the diagnostician →A lot of distribution work is repetitive: showing up in the right comment threads, watching the right people, reaching out at the right moment. By hand it eats a week. Set up well, a lot of it runs in the background and becomes a job for a sharp junior rather than a full-time hire. One caution first: some platforms, LinkedIn especially, fight automation hard, so this needs doing carefully and within their rules.
Turn up consistently, and usefully, in the comments of the people your audience already follows. Doing it regularly builds recognition, and it can be set up so it doesn't take over your day.
Keep a live watch on a list of people who matter to you. When one of them posts, or appears in the media, it prompts you to reach out while it's fresh.
Target the authors, journalists and people with a launch coming up. Warm, researched outreach to book them, and to get yourself booked on their platforms.
A guide in exchange for an email address, then an automated sequence that follows up. Making the guide is the simple bit; the follow-up emails behind it are what bring people back.
All of this feeds one thing: a group of people who would notice if you stopped. That is the Seth Godin test, and it is a better measure than follower counts. The feeling you are building for is simple. If I don't follow this person, or I'm not in here, am I missing something.
The plumbing under it is not glamorous and not hard. The audience finds the content. The content offers a lead magnet. The magnet captures an email. The email list gets a reason to stay, week after week, until some of them are ready for what you sell. Get the housekeeping right, the flow into email and the follow-ups, and it runs in the background while you make the next thing.
Distribution is its own job, separate from making the work.
On video, packaging usually matters more than production. Getting the click is the first job.
Search has changed. Being mentioned by the AI matters as much as ranking on Google.
Build tools people can use. Search can't answer those itself, so it sends people to you.
Automate the repetitive work, carefully, so it isn't a full-time job.
A podcast spreads your name: every guest is another audience that hears it.
Real authority is the rarest advantage you have. Use it.
Try a lot of things, keep what works, do more of it. There is no silver bullet.
54 short chapters on how marketing teams thrive in an AI era. No jargon, no fluff.
Read it →The questions marketers are asking about AI, brand, creativity and strategy, answered.
Browse them →Drop in your metrics and sort what matters from what just looks busy.
Try it →A writing system that checks brand, voice and positioning before it writes a word.
Try it →Submit a plan and get it critiqued by eight expert personas. Built for workshops and teaching.
Try it →How evidence-based decisions took the National Lottery past €1B for the first time.
Read the story →Everything here works when someone keeps at it, watches what's landing and why, and does more of what works. A lot of it isn't complicated. Give a sharp person the time and the right tools and this becomes their job. If any of it is worth a longer conversation, you know where I am.